Arrange for your college to send your official transcripts directly to us. The transcripts must clearly show your program and that you graduated successfully. You will need to complete an application in the member portal and your membership as OACETT will require additional information. There is no fee for the upgrade application. Once we have received all necessary information, the Admissions Committee will review your file and inform you of any outstanding requirements.
Delays are most often caused by incomplete or incorrect applications. Make sure you have submitted all parts of your application and that it has been filled in correctly. Be sure that the people you designated as your professional references have completed and returned their questionnaires.
Once you have paid your membership dues, submitted a complete application, and we have received your professional reference questionnaires, then we can begin to assess your application. Assessing your file will take approximately 4 months.
Experience-level decisions are determined by the OACETT Admissions Committee which consists of OACETT members who are fully familiar with the roles expected of a technologist working in the discipline which the member has applied for. Every experience related document is reviewed by two independent reviewers for fairness and to remove any bias. In situations where the two reviewers do not agree, a third reviewer is assigned to review experience to make a final decision.
Using the job description(s) and references, the Committee examines the level of complexity and judgement AND responsibility and oversight. 
A technician is expected to make INDEPENDENT DECISIONS according to ESTABLISHED RULES and PROCEDURES such as industry standards or government regulation. The majority of activities are routine, typical or standardized.
A technologist has a lead role in COMPLEX activities in frequently changing conditions and has responsibility for ALL PLANNING OF WORK and makes major decisions without manager approval.
Although a member may feel that they are working at the level of a technologist in their industry, OACETT has its own rules and criteria regarding determining experience. If an applicant’s employment experience documents and references do not match OACETT criteria for a technologist, then the rating of technician will be given.
Most members begin in the role of technician and progress into technologist roles as their career progresses. The technologist’s experience requirement for C.E.T. may take more than two years to achieve. In some cases, it may even require the member to change employers to have access to these types of roles.
Every applicant’s total employment experience is unique and includes all their engineering or applied science roles, duration of roles, evidence of progression and references.
Over the years, the Admissions Committee has seen that technologists have been given more responsibilities and that the experience requirements to be a C.E.T. have shifted more towards demonstrating abilities through work experience. This may mean that a job description from before may have met the expectations of a technologist at that point in time, but as expectations have progressed, it may not meet that evaluation level now.
In order to have your current experience reviewed again for consideration for the level of a technologist, your role must have significantly changed from what was previously provided and the job description details support that by meeting the expected profile of a technologist.
Once your employment role has progressed to meet the complexity and final oversight of a technologist, and you have been in that position for at least 6 months, you can submit a new job description so that it can be sent to the Admissions Committee for an experience review. You will also need to submit a supervisor reference.
Please be advised that OACETT admits applicants and certifies members once per month on our admissions date which falls during the first week of the month. Once all necessary documents are submitted, file reviews can take approximately three to four months, technology report proposal reviews one month, technology report reviews two months, and course approvals two to four weeks.
Please note these are average times and some variation may occur based on availability of an expert in your discipline or the volume of files received.